The function of casing is to induce fruiting, support mushroom growth, and provide a source of water to the mushroom that compensates for its water lost through evaporation and transpiration. Sometimes, there has been an overemphasis on the influence of the moisture layer in the casing on mushroom yield and quality. A large variation in the compost substrate moisture may have more influence on mushroom yield and fresh mushroom quality. It is not to say that casing moisture does not influence yield or quality, but it may take a larger disparity in moisture to markedly influence the end product.
The mushroom relies on water potential gradients to move water through the mycelium. Water flows from regions of higher water potential to lower water potential, which helps maintain turgor pressure necessary for mycelial tip extension and growth. This same gradient also affects nutrient transport: nutrients, ions, and metabolites often move along with water via bulk flow or are actively transported across membranes, but their distribution is shaped by the underlying water potential differences within the mycelial network and between the fungus and the compost.
In a mycelial network, water potential gradients help the translocation of nutrients—moving them from the compost, the resource-rich region, to actively growing hyphal tips or fruiting bodies. Under dry conditions, the external water potential becomes too low, water movement into the hyphae slows, reducing nutrient uptake and impairing growth. Conversely, favorable water potential promotes efficient uptake and redistribution of resources throughout the mycelium.
Think of thicker rhizomorphs in the casing as the big pipes that move water and nutrients from the compost to the developing mushrooms. To keep mushrooms healthy and productive, this pipe system needs to stay in good working order all through the crop. Just like it’s easier to move water through a fire hose than a garden hose, well-developed rhizomorphs make water delivery more efficient. Keeping the casing wet or moist is what allows these larger “pipes” to form and continue feeding the mushrooms. If the casing dries out during production, most strains will give lower yields and poorer quality mushrooms. In the end, this whole water network relies on the compost as the main source of water for the crop.
Water is constantly moving during the cropping cycle. Mushrooms take up water into their cells, while water is also lost through evaporation and transpiration. Growers replace this loss mainly by watering the casing layer. However, we still know little about exactly how mushroom mycelium absorbs and transports water, or how water moves through rhizomorphs into the mushroom itself.
Some research suggests that water uptake depends on differences in water potential between the mycelium and the compost solution (Kalberer, 1987). As cropping progresses, mushrooms use water from both the compost and casing, while evaporation, transpiration, and respiration continually reduce the water content of the crop. This loss lowers the water potential inside mushroom cells. Because water moves from higher to lower potential, this gradient may allow mushrooms to absorb water with little energy cost. Another idea is that nutrient absorption helps drive water uptake (Holtz, 1971; 1979; Schroeder & Schisler, 1981; Kalberer, 1987). When nutrients are actively absorbed by the mycelium, the osmotic potential inside the cells decreases. Water then follows passively, moving in response to the concentration of nutrients. The developing mushrooms produce the sugar mannitol and therefore have a much higher concentration than the vegetative mycelium (Holtz, 1976). It was suggested that this different concentration of mannitol creates the osmotic and water potential gradient responsible for “pumping” nutrients and water from the compost mycelium through the casing rhizomorphs and into the developing mushrooms.
In summary, mushroom fruit body development depends on a balance of water movement between the compost, casing, and the developing fruit mushrooms. While casing moisture is important for yield and quality, compost moisture may play an even greater role. Water and nutrients move through the mycelium by water potential gradients, flowing from wetter regions in the compost toward drier hyphal tips and mushrooms. Rhizomorphs act like large pipes, efficiently transporting water and nutrients when casing moisture is maintained; if the casing dries, yields and quality decline. Water uptake is largely passive, driven by gradients in water and osmotic potential, which are influenced by nutrient absorption and the accumulation of compounds like mannitol in mushrooms. Together, these processes form a dynamic water transport system that sustains mushroom development throughout cropping.
REFERENCES
Holtz, R.B. 1971. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of free neutral carbohydrates in mushroom tissue by gas-liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19 (6):1272-1273.
Holtz, R.B. and Smith, D.E. 1979. Lipid metabolism of mushroom mycelia. Mushroom Sci. 10 (Part 1):437-444.
Kalberer, P.P., 1987. Water potentials of casing and substrate and osmotic potentials of fruit bodies of Agaricus bisporus. Sci. Hort. 32:175-182.
Schroeder, G.M. and Schisler, L.C. 1981. Influence of compost and casing moisture on size, yield, and dry weight of mushrooms. Mushroom Sci. 11:495-509.
The function of casing is to induce fruiting, support mushroom growth, and provide a source of water to the mushroom that compensates for its water lost through evaporation and transpiration. Sometimes, there has been an overemphasis on the influence of the moisture layer in the casing on mushroom yield and quality. A large variation in the compost substrate moisture may have more influence on mushroom yield and fresh mushroom quality. It is not to say that casing moisture does not influence yield or quality, but it may take a larger disparity in moisture to markedly influence the end product.
The mushroom relies on water potential gradients to move water through the mycelium. Water flows from regions of higher water potential to lower water potential, which helps maintain turgor pressure necessary for mycelial tip extension and growth. This same gradient also affects nutrient transport: nutrients, ions, and metabolites often move along with water via bulk flow or are actively transported across membranes, but their distribution is shaped by the underlying water potential differences within the mycelial network and between the fungus and the compost.
In a mycelial network, water potential gradients help the translocation of nutrients—moving them from the compost, the resource-rich region, to actively growing hyphal tips or fruiting bodies. Under dry conditions, the external water potential becomes too low, water movement into the hyphae slows, reducing nutrient uptake and impairing growth. Conversely, favorable water potential promotes efficient uptake and redistribution of resources throughout the mycelium.
Think of thicker rhizomorphs in the casing as the big pipes that move water and nutrients from the compost to the developing mushrooms. To keep mushrooms healthy and productive, this pipe system needs to stay in good working order all through the crop. Just like it’s easier to move water through a fire hose than a garden hose, well-developed rhizomorphs make water delivery more efficient. Keeping the casing wet or moist is what allows these larger “pipes” to form and continue feeding the mushrooms. If the casing dries out during production, most strains will give lower yields and poorer quality mushrooms. In the end, this whole water network relies on the compost as the main source of water for the crop.
Water is constantly moving during the cropping cycle. Mushrooms take up water into their cells, while water is also lost through evaporation and transpiration. Growers replace this loss mainly by watering the casing layer. However, we still know little about exactly how mushroom mycelium absorbs and transports water, or how water moves through rhizomorphs into the mushroom itself.
Some research suggests that water uptake depends on differences in water potential between the mycelium and the compost solution (Kalberer, 1987). As cropping progresses, mushrooms use water from both the compost and casing, while evaporation, transpiration, and respiration continually reduce the water content of the crop. This loss lowers the water potential inside mushroom cells. Because water moves from higher to lower potential, this gradient may allow mushrooms to absorb water with little energy cost. Another idea is that nutrient absorption helps drive water uptake (Holtz, 1971; 1979; Schroeder & Schisler, 1981; Kalberer, 1987). When nutrients are actively absorbed by the mycelium, the osmotic potential inside the cells decreases. Water then follows passively, moving in response to the concentration of nutrients. The developing mushrooms produce the sugar mannitol and therefore have a much higher concentration than the vegetative mycelium (Holtz, 1976). It was suggested that this different concentration of mannitol creates the osmotic and water potential gradient responsible for “pumping” nutrients and water from the compost mycelium through the casing rhizomorphs and into the developing mushrooms.
In summary, mushroom fruit body development depends on a balance of water movement between the compost, casing, and the developing fruit mushrooms. While casing moisture is important for yield and quality, compost moisture may play an even greater role. Water and nutrients move through the mycelium by water potential gradients, flowing from wetter regions in the compost toward drier hyphal tips and mushrooms. Rhizomorphs act like large pipes, efficiently transporting water and nutrients when casing moisture is maintained; if the casing dries, yields and quality decline. Water uptake is largely passive, driven by gradients in water and osmotic potential, which are influenced by nutrient absorption and the accumulation of compounds like mannitol in mushrooms. Together, these processes form a dynamic water transport system that sustains mushroom development throughout cropping.
REFERENCES
Holtz, R.B. 1971. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of free neutral carbohydrates in mushroom tissue by gas-liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19 (6):1272-1273.
Holtz, R.B. and Smith, D.E. 1979. Lipid metabolism of mushroom mycelia. Mushroom Sci. 10 (Part 1):437-444.
Kalberer, P.P., 1987. Water potentials of casing and substrate and osmotic potentials of fruit bodies of Agaricus bisporus. Sci. Hort. 32:175-182.
Schroeder, G.M. and Schisler, L.C. 1981. Influence of compost and casing moisture on size, yield, and dry weight of mushrooms. Mushroom Sci. 11:495-509.
The recent shortage of straw and hay in parts of North America and Europe has sparked a flurry of questions regarding what can be used as a substitute for compost ingredients. We thought a quick review of materials listed by Dr. Lee Schisler at the North America Mushroom Conference in the 80s and other materials that may be available around North America and elsewhere would be of some interest. There may be materials that we are not discussing that could be used as compost ingredients, but most likely in areas where better materials are not readily available.
Bulk Ingredients
Straw, whether it be straight wheat straw or bedded horse-manure straw, is the most common bulk ingredient used around the world. Other varieties like barley and rye can be used, although composting practices will need to be modified for these types of straw. The nitrogen, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin content of these straws may vary based on the variety, but differences are probably more related to where and how it is grown. Rice straw, although used in SE Asia, is generally not a desirable material as it is physically short, tough, and hard to break down. Oat straw is also a poor material; as it composts, it quickly becomes flat and soft, contributing to anaerobic conditions. Sorghum and sugar cane fodder can be used, but the stalks should be physically crushed before starting the composting process.
Corn fodder is starting to be used; our research has suggested 25% might be the most one could add to a straw-hay formula without negatively influencing yields. Its structure may also limit its use in systems that do not physically chop the fodder. In Pennsylvania and parts of Canada, mulch hay is a common bulk ingredient, timothy and orchard grasses being the most common varieties. Alfalfa can be used, but it is higher in N and physically can be more challenging to compost. Generally, in hay-based formulas, other bulk ingredients are used to provide additional carbohydrates to the formula. These bulk ingredients include corn cobs (ground or pelletized), cottonseed hulls (as is or pelletized). Less common are items such as hardwood bark or chips; deciduous leaves are used seasonally at one progressive farm, but the collection and storage of this material are challenging. Potato peel and slicer waste has been reported to be an option, but it is probably not commonly used because of problems associated with handling and storage of these high-moisture materials.
Other bulk ingredients that have been tried include peanut and rice hulls, but they are very high in lignin and hard to break down in the short composting times found at most commercial farms. Softwood barks have compounds (phenolic?) toxic to Phase 2 microbes and mushroom mycelium. Kenaf core, a by-product of the fiber collection process, and recycled paper wastes are possible ingredients, but at low amounts, say no more than 5-10% of the total volume. Additional research should be conducted, as paper waste is much different today than when this work was first reported in the 1970s. At this time, we consider spent mushroom compost as a filler material with no useable nutrients or used as an avenue to dispose of small quantities; however, research is being done to determine if larger quantities can be used as a bulk ingredient or as a supplement. Mushroom stumps are often disposed of in compost, but add little to the value of the compost.
Supplements
The “inorganic” sources of nitrogen, those with no carbohydrates, are historically used in synthetic formulas only and at no more than 25 lbs. per dry ton of other ingredients. The most common and only one still readily available is urea, often used with straight wheat straw formulas as a starter ingredient to “soften” the straw early in the pre-conditioning process. Calcium Cyanamid has been reported to be a substitute but must be pH adjusted and is not a commonly available ingredient, and hence not widely used. These inorganic supplements need to be added early in the composting process and are not readily available to the Phase II microbes.
More “organic” supplements, ones with carbohydrates readily available, are valuable but more expensive and therefore generally used later in the composting process to ensure there is a balanced formula. These ingredients include more common materials such as brewer’s and or distiller’s grain, cocoa bean hulls (contain an oil that microbes like), cottonseed meal, bedded poultry manure, ground soybean, rapeseed screenings, and sugar cane bagasse. Poultry manure for broilers is most common, but layer poultry manure, dried and processed, may also be used. The nitrogen content of poultry manure may vary depending on the source, number of flocks bedded on it, and other factors, so it is suggested to analyze the N content on a regular basis. Liquid poultry manure is used in some tunnel facilities that are designed to handle it. Rapeseed oil meal (expeller or solvent) or screenings are more likely to be available in the northern states and in Canada.
Other not so common supplements would be brewers dried yeast, buckwheat millings, castor bean meal, corn gluten feed (include bran), corn gluten meal, feather meal, fish solubles, linseed oil meal (Flax seed), malt sprouts, peanut oil meal, safflower oil meal (expeller or solvent), sesame oil meal (expeller or solvent), single cell protein, soybean screenings, soybean oil meal (expeller or solvent), cocoa hulls, sugar beet pulp (source of carbon), sunflower oil meal (expeller or solvent), wheat bran, wheat germ meal, and wheat mill run. Feather meal is high in N, so it is important to have a good distribution in the mixing. Fish solubles are high in moisture and difficult to handle.
Other feedlot manures can be used if generously bedded on straw with an effective pre-conditioning period, although I know of a small hobbyist grower who was composting straight cow manure (no straw) and successfully growing mushrooms. Blood meal has nitrogen, but in a form that has very little available to the microbes in Phase II. Apple pumice and paunch are too acidic and easily go anaerobic; therefore, they would not be adding desirable characteristics to the formula.
As you can see, there is a wide variety of raw materials available, and it is up to each of you to decide what works. What works in one part of the world, or at one farm, might not necessarily work in a different system. Material availability and economics will also play an important role in deciding what raw materials work for you.
Of all the diseases confronting mushroom growers, none have been the subject of more confusion than viral diseases. Viral diseases can be confused with the effect of poor cultural practices or the bacterial disease mummy. Since no known commercial mushroom strain is resistant to viruses, growers must incorporate preventive measures into the IPM plan and rigorously carry out control measures.
The virus lives in mushroom spores and mycelium (spawn). Infected spores spread the disease to other new crops. Infected mycelium (spawn) may survive in the bed boards or quickly spread in bulk phase III facilities. Spores survive many years and can be released during farm renovations.
Symptoms (Figure 1-4):
Severe infection:
Control:
![]() figure 1 |
![]() figure 2 |
![]() figure 3 |
![]() figure 4 |
1) Bacterial Blotch
Signs and Symptoms:
2) Mummy Disease
Signs and Symptoms:
By David M. Beyer, Penn State University
Fungal Diseases
The life cycle for fungal pathogens like Dry Bubble, Trichoderma, and Cobweb is simple, Figure 1. Spores germinate into mycelium, which forms structures that produce spores. In a petri dish culture that may take less than a week; in compost or casing, it is probably pretty much the same. However, other factors like pH, moisture, and nutrient availability may influence this life cycle timing. Much of that, however, is unknown for these pathogens.
Figure 1 Typical fungal life cycle showing spores to fruiting. Source: researchgate.net |
Looking at the disease cycle in mushroom cultivation, we know a relationship exists between spore load, time of infection, and symptoms or signs of disease development. Let’s look at the three most common fungal diseases and what we know about these relationships.
Dry Bubble, caused by Lecanicillium, or Verticillium has symptoms that develop based on spore load and timing of infection. Spores coming in contact with a fully colonized spawn run don’t germinate well and little disease will develop. It may be possible that spores landing on the substrate the day before or the day of casing could cause an early disease development. Spores in contact with the rhizomorphs in the casing will easily germinate. How fast they germinate, and the vegetative mycelium growth may be influenced by casing pH, moisture, relative humidity, and temperature.
It is unknown what the optimum conditions are but in general the warmer the conditions the faster the growth and the shorter time from spore to symptom development. In general, spore to symptom takes about seven to 14 days depending on the above factors. However, when Dry Bubble mycelium is in contact with mushroom pins,metabolites are produced that degrade mushroom tissue. This process seems quick, perhaps hours to a day or two.
Read the full factsheet here.
Written by: David M. Beyer
We are observing that the amount of mycelium in the casing soil often leaves much to be desired. Ideally, thick mycelium strands should grow from the bottom to the top of the casing soil, while leaving enough casing soil not yet overgrown with mycelium. This remaining casing soil serves as a water buffer for the compost and mushrooms.
It's crucial to remember that this water buffer also determines how long and how much you can evaporate in the growing room before the casing soil dries out. If the casing soil dries out, you will need to water, even if it's not ideal for the mushroom quality. Therefore, it is important to pay close attention to the mycelium growth in the casing soil.
If there is structurally too much mycelium in the casing soil, a few adjustments can improve the situation. One option is to start ventilating earlier, although this means the mycelium may not reach the surface as much as usual. You can also adjust the watering schedule.
Once the mycelium starts growing from the top layer of compost and the casing material, it is essential to keep the casing soil well-moisturized. Each watering essentially stops the mycelium; weak mycelium struggles with this and can barely continue developing, whereas strong mycelium has fewer issues and continues to grow. In this way, you encourage more strong mycelium and reduce the amount of mycelium in the casing soil.
Our mushroom strains tend to form pins quite spontaneously, so many growers are ventilating extremely slowly. While this isn't necessarily a problem, it's important to realize that as long as the compost temperature is above 23°C, the mycelium will keep growing in the casing soil. Therefore, you should start ventilating earlier or increase circulation to bring the compost temperature below 23°C quickly. Once the compost temperature reaches 23°C, you can reduce circulation and control the number of pins by adjusting the air temperature.
I believe that with this method, you can control the amount of mycelium to some extent without leading to too many pins or a lack of distribution in the first flush. You might also consider using slightly heavier casing soil.
Slightly drier casing soil offers more certainty in terms of mycelium growth. Also, pay attention to covering. Avoid running the pinning axis and leveler too quickly to prevent structural damage. The mixing of the casing should be adequate, but more speed is unnecessary for the pinning axis.
Written by: Jeroen van Lier | Total Mushroom Service